Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

02 Tunneling

Aim

To show tunneling of a wave through a barrier.

Subjects

Diagram

.

Figure 1:.

Equipment

Presentation

Preparation

The demonstration is set up as shown in Diagram A and B.

The camera and monitor are placed in order to make the gap between the paraffin wax blocks visible to the audience.

The slideway is needed in order to shift one of the paraffin wax triangles along a straight line.

When you prepare the demonstration, use the set ups as shown in Figure 2B and -C: In Figure 2B, the meter, indicating the signal received by R1, should be equal to the signal that will be received by R2 in the situation of Figure 2C. To achieve this, careful positioning is needed for sender S\mathrm{S}, the paraffin wax blocks and both receivers.

.

Figure 2:.

Presentation

The demonstration is following a sequence as shown in Figure1 through 2 (A-E).

Figure A

The sender and receivers are switched on. Receiver R1 shows a deflection. (R2 has no deflection.) Placing your hand in front of SS will make clear that R1R 1 really receives the signal send by S\mathrm{S}.

Fiqure B

Both triangular blocks are, as one square block, placed between sender S\mathrm{S} and receiver R1. The receiver will show the same deflection as in the foregoing situation (A). Conclusion is that the paraffin wax is completely transparent to the microwaves. It can be compared with the transparency of glass to light. (Optional: show this also with laser and a square piece of glass)

Figure C

A triangular block of paraffine wax is placed in front of the sender SS as shown in Figure B. Receiver R1 has no deflection, so it receives no signal. But receiver R2 shows a deflection, and this deflection is equal to that of the previous situation (Figure A). Clearly the signal from the sender is deflected by the paraffin block towards R2. Again the comparison with glass and light can be made. (Optional: show this with a laser and a rectangular prism)

.

Figure 3:.

Figure D-E

The second triangular paraffin block is placed close to the receiver as Figure D shows. Then this block slides along the slideway slowly towards the other paraffin block. In the beginning nothing is different from the foregoing situation: R2 has still full deflection and R1 has no deflection. But when the blocks come within a distance smaller than the wavelength of the microwaves, R1 starts receiving signal and R2 receives less. Clearly there is barrier penetration! Making the separation still smaller this take-over continues until situation BB is there again.

The weirdness of this phenomenon should be stressed, by mentioning that if in situation E\mathrm{E} part of the signal clearly passes the air gap, this means that also in situation C\mathrm{C} and D\mathrm{D} the signal from S\mathrm{S} also passes the wall between wax and air to a certain depth, but when the signal “feels” no wax at that depth it “chooses” deflection towards R2. Between D and EE the “penetration depth” can be determined.

(Optional: Show that laser light that enters a beam splitter is partially transmitted and partially deflected)

Explanation

Apparently, the transition from wax to air into the straight on direction towards R1, as in Figure 2C, is a barrier to the microwaves, but not completely (as in Figure 3D and E-\mathrm{E} ). Solving the Schroedinger wave equation provides a satisfying solution, because this shows that within a barrier the solution to the wave equation is decaying exponential, dying away to zero, and so, if that barrier ends before this zero is reached, then there is again a sinusoidal wave function. (See the many textbooks on this subject.)

Remarks

Sources