Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

01 Fresnel Double Mirror

Aim

To show the interference of two coherent beams of light.

Subjects

Diagram

.

Figure 1:.

Equipment

Presentation

The room is darkened and the laser is switched on. By means of the +20 mm+20 \mathrm{~mm} lens an illuminated disk is projected on the white screen. The Fresnel double mirror is adjusted so that the two halves of the mirror are parallel. The mirror surface is shifted into the diverging light beam, approximately parallel to it and turned just that much so that the beam of rays strike both mirror halves equally. Two light spots (half circles) are visible on the screen/monitor, separated by a dark zone (see Figure 2).

.

Figure 2:.

Turning the adjustment screw of the Fresnel mirror, the movable part of the mirror is tilted and the two light spots start overlapping. From a distance, an intensification of the light in the overlapping zone is clearly observed. Then, at a closer look, by means of a camera, a clear interference pattern is observed. (see Figure 3).

.

Figure 3:.

Stress especially the clearly visible increase in intensity of the fringes themselves and the zero intensity between them, illustrating respectively the constructive - and destructive interference. The separation between the fringes becomes less the more the movable mirror is pivoted.

Explanation

One part of the wavefront coming from point SS is reflected from the first mirror and the other part is reflected from the second mirror (see Figure 4).

.

Figure 4:.

An interference field exists in the region where the two reflected waves are superimposed. The mirror images S1S_{1} and S2S_{2} can be considered as separate coherent sources, placed a distance aa apart. The separation ( Δy\Delta y ) between the fringes is given by Δysaλ\Delta y \approx \frac{s}{a} \lambda ( ss being the distance between the plane of the two sources and the screen).

So the more the double mirror is pivoted, the larger the distance between the images S1S_{1} and S2S_{2} will be and thus the fringe separation Δy\Delta y decreases.

Remarks

Sources